The Lottery and Public Policy


Lottery is a form of gambling that offers money prizes for the chance to win. Its roots are ancient, with the Old Testament having Moses instructed to divide land by lot, and Roman emperors using it for property and slave giveaways at Saturnalian feasts. It is one of the most popular forms of gambling in the world and a major source of public revenue in some countries. In addition, it is the subject of controversy because of its perceived effects on low-income groups and other aspects of its operation and marketing.

Lotteries are run as businesses with a primary function of maximizing revenues. As such, their advertising is primarily focused on persuading potential gamblers to spend their money on tickets. This creates an inescapable tension between the lottery’s business model and its public service mission, with the latter often coming into conflict with state laws against the promotion of gambling. Moreover, the lottery’s operations can be at odds with other state policies and programs, such as efforts to combat problem gambling or to promote education.

Most state lotteries begin their existence as traditional raffles, with people purchasing tickets for a drawing that occurs at some future date, usually weeks or months away. After a period of dramatic growth, however, revenues typically level off and even decline. Lottery officials then have to introduce new games or other promotions to maintain or increase revenues.

The result is that lottery marketing increasingly focuses on large jackpots, which attract attention and drive ticket sales. But such jackpots can also make the lottery appear less unbiased. The fact that the colors of each cell in the above plot are largely similar is evidence that the results are not completely random. If they were, the same color would likely appear in every cell a relatively equal number of times.

This reliance on high jackpots is at odds with the public’s desire to support the lottery by making donations, which are tax deductible. It is also inconsistent with the lottery’s stated purpose of providing funds for a wide range of public purposes, including reducing poverty.

A second concern is the regressive impact of the lottery on lower-income groups. In a country with such a high proportion of poor citizens, the lottery may be seen as a particularly unjust and harmful form of gambling.

Lottery officials can counter these concerns by stressing that they are not promoting gambling, but simply the chance to become rich, through luck. They also can argue that the large percentage of proceeds that go to prizes and taxes makes the lottery a relatively benign form of gambling. The question is whether these arguments are persuasive enough to offset the regressive nature of the lottery. Even if they are, is it appropriate for a government to be in the business of persuading people to spend their hard-earned income on lottery tickets?

Comments are closed.